Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX offers a gear ratio of 5.6:1, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
