Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter / 34.25 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa BG 1500X
