Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33858 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
