Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275
Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Mitchell 308 2000X
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin REDIX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX
Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X