Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
82.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
