Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
88.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
