Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X

Shimano 19 Stella
Spinning
88.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €809.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/275

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
55.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 19 Stella and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
