Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X
