Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Aero C5000X
