Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
