Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
