Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX stands out for a weight of 300g / 10,58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
