Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
68.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.41 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 91 centimeter / 35.83 inch and a weight of 255g / 8,99oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
