Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310

Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano FX?
Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano FX 3000 FCX
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
