Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Shimano 20 Stella

Spinning

92.30 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.7:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight415g / 14.64oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €667.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

87.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.54 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight195g / 6.88oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €163.20
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency