Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
92.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €667.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
