Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €677.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
