Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX edges out Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch) and the maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). Still, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 165g / 5,82oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.8 out of 10 (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- With a score like 8.9 out of 10 (165g / 5,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag
