Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.8 out of 10 (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX
