Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch) and the maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.8 out of 10 (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
