Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.8 out of 10 (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX
