Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (13kg / 28,66lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.8 out of 10 (103 centimeter / 40.55 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
