Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT
Spinning
4000 D-cx
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €176.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX edges out Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (210g / 7,41oz). Still, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 17 Prorex LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
