Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
