Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
72.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX
