Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
