Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
