Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.8:1). Still, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 13kg / 28,66lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X
