Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.8:1). Still, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 13kg / 28,66lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 4500X
