Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX and Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
