Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
62.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX and Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX
