Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
53.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX edges out Shimano Catana FE C 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). Still, Shimano Catana FE C 3000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 260g / 9,17oz and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
