Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano FX
Spinning
62.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX and Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano FX?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
