Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8.82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
