Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (13kg / 28,66lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
