Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
