Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Mitchell 300 4000X
Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X