Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 87 centimeter / 34.25 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
