Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
