Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
52.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (13kg / 28,66lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
