Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX and Shimano AERO XR 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano AERO XR 4000X stands out for a ball bearings of 5+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
