Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
51.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €30.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). While Shimano Catana FE 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Catana FE?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 2500X
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX
