Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano FX
Spinning
52.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank71 centimeter / 27.95 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 FC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano FX 3000 FCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (6.2:1). While Shimano FX 3000 FCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano FX?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano FX 3000 FCX
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.14 out of 10 (71 centimeter / 27.95 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
