Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and total score (8.42 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Decent value at €743.33, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
