Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX and Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
