Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000S R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000S R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (13kg / 28,66lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9.87oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX
