Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (13kg / 28,66lbs). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 20 Stella and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (13kg / 28,66lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
