Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X
