Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
