Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
